
Genetic Screening and NIPT
Genetic screening estimates the chance of a condition; diagnostic testing (chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis) confirms it
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) measures cell-free DNA in the mother’s blood; it can be done from 10 weeks and carries no risk of miscarriage
For Down syndrome it detects over 99% with a false-positive rate under 0.1–0.5%, better than the combined test or quadruple test
NIPT is still a screening test: a positive result needs confirmation by a diagnostic test before any decision about the pregnancy
In western Odisha, screening for sickle cell disease and thalassaemia at booking, with partner testing, is the most useful genetic screening and should never be missed
| Type | What it does |
|---|---|
| Carrier screening | Finds healthy people who carry a gene change; in India, HPLC for sickle cell and beta-thalassaemia is the key test, and the partner should be tested if the woman is a carrier |
| Aneuploidy screening | Estimates the chance of trisomy 21, 18, or 13 (combined test, quadruple test, or NIPT) |
| Structural screening | Anomaly scan at 18–22 weeks finds many major anomalies; it is offered to all |
| Diagnostic testing | Chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis with karyotype or chromosomal microarray gives a definite answer for chromosome conditions |
| Who should be offered | Every pregnant woman should be offered screening; women with higher risk (age 35 or over, previous affected pregnancy, abnormal scan, family history) are offered diagnostic testing directly |
| Test | Timing | Approximate detection for trisomy 21 |
|---|---|---|
| Combined first-trimester test | 11–13+6 weeks | About 85–90% at a 5% false-positive rate; nuchal translucency, PAPP-A, free beta-hCG, and maternal age |
| Quadruple test | 15–20 weeks | About 80% at a 5% false-positive rate; AFP, hCG, uE3, inhibin A |
| NIPT (cell-free DNA) | From 10 weeks | Over 99% with a false-positive rate under 0.1–0.5% |
| Contingent approach | Combined test first, NIPT only for the intermediate-risk group | Lower cost, with most of the benefit of NIPT |
| Practical point | Where NIPT is unaffordable | The combined test with a good nuchal translucency scan remains a sound choice |
| Topic | Details |
|---|---|
| How it works | Cell-free DNA in the mother’s blood comes mainly from the placenta (fetal fraction about 4–10% or more, from 10 weeks); the laboratory counts chromosome fragments to find extra or missing copies |
| Sample | One blood tube from the mother; no fasting; result in about 1–2 weeks |
| What it screens | Trisomy 21, 18, and 13; some laboratories add sex chromosome conditions and selected microdeletions, which are less reliable |
| What it does not find | Single gene conditions, structural anomalies, neural tube defects, most small deletions, and mosaicism that is confined to the placenta |
| Positive predictive value | Depends on how common the condition is: for trisomy 21 it is high in older women, but lower in young women, and lower again for trisomy 13 and 18 and sex chromosome conditions (about 50–60% at age 25 and over 90% at age 40 for Down syndrome; approximate) |
| Causes of a false result | Confined placental mosaicism, a vanished twin, maternal chromosome change, maternal cancer, organ transplant, recent blood transfusion, or low fetal fraction |
| Twins and IVF | Can be used in twins for trisomy 21 with slightly lower accuracy; not suitable after donor egg from a different woman without advice, or with a vanished twin |
| No result | Occurs in about 1–5%; more often with higher maternal weight or early sampling; repeat once if the fetal fraction is low, and offer other testing if it fails again |
| Result | What to do |
|---|---|
| Low chance | Reassure that the chance is very low but not zero; continue the anomaly scan and routine care |
| High chance | Counsel the same day, offer chorionic villus sampling (11–14 weeks) or amniocentesis (from 15 weeks); the woman decides whether to proceed |
| No result | Review dating and weight, repeat once, and offer a scan review or diagnostic test |
| Discordant findings | Normal NIPT with abnormal scan means diagnostic testing with microarray |
| Diagnostic procedure | Karyotype and, where available, chromosomal microarray; fetal loss risk is low (about 0.1–0.3% or less), done by an experienced operator under ultrasound |
| After a procedure | Anti-D immunoglobulin to Rh-negative women; advise rest for the day and warning signs (bleeding, fluid loss, fever) |
| Confirmed abnormality | Refer to a fetal medicine or genetic team; discuss outcome, options, and support |
| Topic | Advice |
|---|---|
| Counselling before testing | Explain what is tested and what is not; that the result is a chance; the possible results; cost; and the right to decline |
| Counselling style | Non-directive, in a language she understands, and with her partner if she wishes |
| Consent | Written, informed consent before NIPT and before any invasive test |
| PCPNDT Act | Sex determination and disclosure are prohibited; testing should be done in registered centres and laboratories, with the required forms; laboratories must not report fetal sex (check the current rules and your laboratory’s policy) |
| MTP Act | Termination is lawful within the limits of the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act (as amended in 2021); beyond the usual limit, a medical board decides for substantial fetal abnormality (confirm the current provisions) |
| Privacy | Keep results confidential; share only with the woman unless she agrees |
| Support | Offer follow-up counselling, and a team for care of a child with Down syndrome if she continues |
Calling NIPT a diagnostic test and advising termination on it alone
Skipping the anomaly scan because the NIPT was normal
Missing carrier screening for sickle cell and thalassaemia and not testing the partner
Sending blood too early (before 10 weeks) or without confirming dates
Reading a sex chromosome result without counselling or disclosing fetal sex
Offering the tests without pre-test counselling or without consent
Forgetting anti-D after a diagnostic procedure in an Rh-negative woman

No comments:
Post a Comment